Evidence For Christianity

I am continually amazed at how many people blindly accept the "theory of evolution" without even thinking about it.

It seems that most people think that the evolutionists have the intellectual upper hand.

For those who have really studied this issue, however, the reality is MUCH different.

I don't know how anyone can look at the eye or the brain and say they were just an accident.

The reality is that evolution is not backed up by the evidence.

If evolution was true, we should have millions upon millions of transitional fossils.

But the reality is this:

"I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualise such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?"

-Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, in letter to Luther Sunderland, April 10, 1979. Cited in: Sunderland, Luther D., Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems (El Cajon, CA: Master Books, 1988), p. 89.

If evolution was true, then we should see an "evolutionary tree" in the fossil record, with complex life developing very slowly from earlier less complex forms. Instead, we see the sudden, instant appearance of fully formed complex life (some evolutionists refer to this sudden appearance of complex life as the "Cambrian explosion").

In addition, evolutionists are at a complete loss for how to explain the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal.

As another article explains:

"The key issue is the type of change required — to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content, from over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of even the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism to three billion ‘letters’ (stored in each human cell nucleus)."

The evolutionists cannot show us a single example of functional new information being added to any creature in all of history.

Now, a question for evolutionists who may be reading this:

You have enough blind faith to believe that life just popped into existence from nonlife, and that such life just happened to have the ability to take in the nourishment it needed, to expel waste, and to reproduce itself, all the while having everything it needed to survive in the environment in which it suddenly found itself?

Also, we have a standing challenge for any evolutionist, skeptic or atheist to go debunk these videos:

http://www.leestrobel.com/Creator.htm

If you think that you can debunk them then you are better than any evolutionist I have ever met, and I would love for you to leave a comment to this article explaining how you are able to debunk them.